Skip navigation

Home About us Water sectors Skills and services Water projects News and events Working with us Contact us
 
Search




Browse


Aral Sea, Central Asia Bangkok Wastewater, Thailand Black Sea, Regional Bradford UPM, UK Brighton/Hove Wastewater, UK Brno Sewerage, Czech Republic Cork Main Drainage, Ireland Corporate Development, Russia DC Water and Sewerage, USA Doe Park Reservoir, UK Equity, Irrigation, Poverty, Asia Esholt WwTW, UK Institutional Building, Romania Kpong Irrigation Project, Ghana Master Plan, Oman Mirfa Desalination, UAE Pumping Plants, Kuwait Shanghai Sewerage, China Transboundary Rivers, CIS Water Resources, China Thames Water Ring Main, UK Water Supplies, Uganda Wessex Water AMP4, UK
In focus

 

Equity, Irrigation, Poverty – Asia

farmer and fieldsIrrigation Canal Digging, NepalWomen in paddyIrrigated Fields, NepalEquity, Irrigation and Poverty: a DFID-funded Knowledge and Research (KaR) project, implemented in India, Kyrgyzstan and Nepal. Its aim was to identify methods for strengthening water governance on large-scale irrigation, thereby improving equity of access to water and enhancing livelihoods.

Irrigation has many direct and indirect impacts on the livelihoods of the poor and is important for poverty reduction. However, the direct impact is severely reduced by poor management of water distribution at a local level. Even within small areas some farmers can get an adequate supply of water while others have insufficient water.

One approach now widely adopted for solving this problem is to transfer responsibility for management at a local level to the users, often referred to as Participatory Irrigation Management (PIM). Associations of water users (WUAs) are established, provided with a reliable supply of water from a strengthened system for managing the main canals, and expected to manage the water from these canals. However, there are technical and institutional reasons why distribution of water remains inequitable.

In this project we investigated how WUAs share water at local level, evaluated what impact this has on the livelihoods of the poor, and then helped the WUAs to improve distribution of water amongst their members.

Through case studies we developed a systematic process for strengthening local institutions, for improving their co-ordination with external water supply agencies, and for helping them improve the distribution of water. We enabled a social and political dialogue amongst all classes of stakeholder (including women and poor farmers as well as the rich male farmers and landlords) on the nature of a ‘fair’ distribution and how the WUA can achieve this.

Through the study we have demonstrated improvements in water distribution, social relations and livelihoods. We have shown that it is not effective to address water distribution in isolation – technical, social, institutional, and policy conditions which affect water distribution must all be considered. Thus there are four ‘key ingredients’ required to improve irrigation water management:

  • improved technical and management procedures, designed by
  • well-informed, involved stakeholders, and implemented by
  • a strong, ‘embedded’ and respected local institution, working within
  • an appropriate external environment, which gives WUAs the necessary authority and support, and assures them of a predictable water supply


© Mott MacDonald Group Limited 2008
Site by Mott MacDonald and Radley Yeldar ›