Skip navigation

Home About us Water sectors Skills and services Water projects News and events Working with us Contact us
 
Search




Browse


Biodiversity Capital maintenance Carbon footprint Collaborative working Desalination Development services Due diligence Expert witness Headroom analysis Master Planning and Feasibility Studies Mergers and acquisitions Odour control Participatory approach Privatisation Process design Programme management River basin management Seawater cooling systems Surge analysis Water governance
 

Carbon footprint

Mott MacDonald is at the forefront of the understanding of the impact of carbon emissions on the environment and in taking account of the “carbon footprint” when assessing the sustainability of proposed water and wastewater assets.

Policies introduced by the UK Government will encourage the consideration of the total carbon emissions related to any new facility with the ultimate aim of zero carbon development. For carbon trading purposes, the project boundaries for assessing carbon emissions are normally tightly drawn as, in theory, suppliers of construction materials should have already accounted for their own emissions in the manufacture of their products. However, in establishing total emissions as an input to a project appraisal, it is appropriate to consider the production of the materials necessary for the construction of the assets themselves.

By far the most 'expensive' of the common construction materials, in carbon terms, are concrete and steel, with energy use being the predominant operational carbon source. Typically, operational emissions might be anticipated to overtake those resulting from construction of the asset after around 10-15 years, though this will depend on the quantum of civil works, use of alternative materials and the sophistication of the design.

As an example for wastewater treatment facilities, conventional wisdom suggests that conventional, large footprint design solutions would be less energy-intensive and should be low carbon solutions. However, this needs investigation on a case-by-case basis as the imbedded emissions in the increased civil works usually associated with such conventional solutions may outweigh the lower civil works and higher energy consumption of more sophisticated, 'small footprint' plants. With respect to sludge treatment, the argument is heavily affected by the opportunity to generate benefit (energy) from the sludge and therefore offset carbon used in operation. In this instance, a higher technology solution may provide a carbon 'payback'. These issues all need assessment as part of an overall appraisal / feasibility study.


© Mott MacDonald Group Limited 2008
Site by Mott MacDonald and Radley Yeldar ›